Thanks Nep_Blanc. Do you think you could ever do a super high quality encode of Clannad with Flac Audio in the future? I can’t find anything good for clannad in HEVC at the Moment.

Finally a decent size for amazing quality. Thanks a lot for this!

No thanks needed and Quality first not quantity, though more quantity is the strive later ^^.
Also Clannad hmm good question i’ll take a look… Oookay you are in luck there are some I could take a look into I see first season and well second season Called after story both are really big downloads but I will add em.

Thanks Nep_Blanc. I will wait patiently as i know these things take time.

as matters get worse I have a backlog of encodes so yea ^^

im still kind of new to this but when i downloaded it and played i wasnt getting any subs any ideas?

what player are you using?
I use Media player classic with K-Lite Codec Pack full so I never miss any codec and or sub.
Also just right click most of the times on the video in the player and click subs if they are there.

Im using the KCP pack as a loader ill try yours out

Your recommendation worked thanks

No Problem ^^ Always here to help with some smaller minor issues >(^-^)<

Thanks alot for this! Question, though. Aside from the subs by Nii-sama and MTBB, what are the sources and differences between the other two ENG subs, just out of curiosity (Tracks 3 and 4 in the default list, both unnamed). Perfect release otherwise.

Just original subs from the bdmv I add those but just for reference

Alright, cool. Choice is always good, though the other subs are almost identical to Nii-sama’s from what I’ve seen. Still, no complaints here. Thanks again.

No problem ^^ just for the viewers enjoyment and for my own enjoyment too of course because I watch anime as well.

Thank you Nep_

thanks!

@bbgPPm7fYE Did you actually look at this? This is the same size as mine yet the video is bitrate starved since his is mostly taken up by two 24 bit FLAC tracks.
There’s no perceptible difference between FLAC and QAAC q127 but there’s certainly one between 6000kbps Hi10P and 3000kbps HEVC:
https://img2.picload.org/image/drdawiii/yournamekiminonawa2016bd1080ph.png
https://img2.picload.org/image/drdawiil/nep_blancyourname-kiminonawa.m.png

Again no Bitrate Starvation This is how X265 works

Also Funny that it looks overly sharp again and grainy at parts where it does not needs to be grainy, indicating that there is a overusage of sharpening or a wrong preset.

Mine’s unfiltered and looks exactly like the source BD. Which I happen to still have:
https://img3.picload.org/image/drdlgooa/00002.m2ts_snapshot_00.00.47_2.png
You’re confusing x265’s habit of smoothing when it’s bitsarved with some sort of improvement. Blurring is not a quality gain.

Well Have fun man With ur so Called Bitstarvation that you call to see on my encodes, I recall bitstarvation being totally with blocks and actually visible artefacts when you look at them live.
This is just another obvious way of you trying to get your way to bash me and my encodes, I will say this again, bitstarvation exists when you set a constant bitrate, as I set my preset to CRF 18 with Medium encoder preset this is not immediately considered bistarvation, this is called quality degradation on an already lossy medium, each time you encode you get more and more losses, even with high presets.
This is to be expected and well saying I have experimented more with lower CRF values I simply don’t see the need to up the bitrate drastically to counter the imperceptible losses that incur anyways.

Yours doesn’t look like the source due to not enough bitrate. What do you think bitstarvation is? It’s starved of the bitrate needed to make it look like the source.
It’s not the worst bitstarved crap in the world and wouldn’t count as a mini encode, but it’s still only a tier or so above Youtube. Is this what you were going for? If not, start giving your encode more fucking bitrate. That’s not bashing, it’s sound advice.

Mine release is exactly the same size as yours and the video is MUCH MUCH MUCH improved because you wasted bitrate on placebo FLAC while I spent it on video. Now take a listen to my audio. Guess what? It’s going to sound EXACTLY like your FLAC because I encoded it in high enough bitrate AAC for it to be COMPLETELY indistinguishable. Why are you bitstarving the video and going with FLAC? FLAC should be reserved for ReinForce-level encodes because THAT’S the point where you’re saying, “Size is no object.” You obviously have a concern about size because you’re smearing the detail out of these videos to get there. May I suggest you encode the audio and loosen up your grip on the video a bit? Take the reduction where it’s free before you start taking it where it destroys quality.

Flac placebo
Funs but not true
aac is factually lossy so it’s worse and it’s entirely noticeable, I really hear it immediately compared to your only just transcoded audio.
above youtube quality
Well thanks for the comment do you want a cookie now?
Why are you bitstarving the video and going with FLAC?
Bitstarving is objective and you seem to be getting pissed that I praise Flac so much, sorry but I’ve already explained that visually it’s less perceptible.
Also I’m not so much destructive that you would say that is really is that kind of low grade 2003 online video quality, and the smoothing that happens according to you is totally acceptable.

I even do AAC encodes on set presets for people that request it, as I don’t fully support these, they won’t be uploaded later as much compared to the ones with flac.
Also on a Friendly note, You’re so overconfident of yourself that you seem to forget who is the one that is not seeing the point.
Get a life and Leave me and my encodes alone if you don’t like them, forcing your vision on others is generally a bad thing.
I really get tired of typing Alineas long of text just getting you shut up but you seem just to get more salt and salt the further we go.

Look, the point is your video is bitstarved. Either fix it or have the decency to admit in your releases that the video is smeared to hell because you prefer it that way.

I have admitted that my video is not as close to the source, that doesn’t mean it’s bitstarvation, so just leave it be and stop the bashing, you ideal forcing moron that you are.
My breath is long and you’ll see.

If it’s not bitstarvation then what is it? Are you actually applying a blurring filter to get it this way? That mess doesn’t look to come from overdone debanding and the only thing it kinda looks like is too strong temporal denoising, which you certainly shouldn’t have used here since the Blu-ray has no noise.
I think you’re just bitstarving it.

oh still at it well you are a stubborn moron that I tell ya :P

Tester here, I rechecked audio streams for this anime, it is syncing correctly with the video, and/or any dubbing in this encode should be synced correctly with the video as well.